Meghan IN SHOCK As Harry, Lilibet & Archie REMOVED From Line Of Succession After Balmoral Summit
In recent weeks, rumors have swirled around Prince Harry and the potential removal of both him and his children, Archie and Lilibet, from the British line of succession. These speculations have ignited discussions within royal circles and the public alike, leading many to question whether the Duke of Sussex’s place in the royal hierarchy is, in fact, secure.
Prince Harry, once a beloved figure both in the UK and globally, has seen his reputation take a significant hit in recent years. His once-cherished position as a senior royal, complete with a seat at state banquets and public adoration, has been replaced by growing criticism and estrangement from his family. Much of this tension has stemmed from Harry’s memoir, Spare, where he controversially wrote about his strained relationship with his father, King Charles, even suggesting a momentary desire to harm him. This revelation, among others, has fueled the argument that Harry should no longer be in the line of succession.
For many royal watchers, the question is not just about Harry’s position but also that of his children, Archie and Lilibet, who currently stand sixth and seventh in line to the throne, respectively. However, due to their permanent residence outside the UK and the fact that Harry no longer undertakes royal duties, there are growing calls to reconsider their positions. The argument follows that if Harry himself is deemed unfit to maintain his place in the line of succession, his children should also be removed, especially given the absence of any significant connection to the British royal family.
The current discussions, reportedly taking place at Balmoral where the Royal Family has gathered, are said to include the possibility of altering the line of succession. Sources suggest that the family is weighing whether to strip Harry, Meghan, and their children of their titles and positions. These discussions, while speculative, have precedent. The line of succession has been altered in the past due to various circumstances, such as when individuals have moved abroad or ceased to perform royal duties.
Constitutional experts have weighed in on the matter, noting that while residing abroad doesn’t automatically disqualify a royal from the line of succession, it can be grounds for removal if coupled with a failure to fulfill royal obligations. Professor Robert Blackburn of King’s College London noted that changes to the line of succession can be enacted by statute, meaning Parliament could legally remove Harry and his children from their positions if deemed necessary. This legal avenue has been used in the past, making the current discussions at Balmoral all the more significant.
Despite these considerations, some believe that any action to remove Harry and his children from the line of succession is unlikely to happen under King Charles III. The King, who is reportedly dealing with health issues, may not have the resolve to make such a drastic decision. Instead, many speculate that this responsibility may fall to Prince William when he ascends the throne. Prince William, who has reportedly severed ties with Harry, is seen as less inclined to tolerate his brother’s actions and could be the one to take decisive steps to remove Harry and his family from the royal fold.
The possibility of Prince Harry and his children being removed from the line of succession remains a topic of intense debate. While constitutional law allows for such a move, whether it will happen under King Charles III or be left to Prince William remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the royal family is facing increasing pressure to address the issue, and any decision made will have lasting implications for the future of the monarchy.
